Sunday, August 19, 2007

Creationism reaches the Philippines

Do you remember Sonia Zaide, the history textbook writer?

Apparently she's gone Creationist, in the most extreme sense of the word.

I went to National Bookstore the other day and bought the latest edition of her textbook for 1st year high school students, because I wanted to see what textbooks are out there. The textbook is called,"Philippine History and Government."

Here are some direct quotes.

"Origin of the Philippines. There are many explanations about the origin of our land. As Christians, we believe that the land forms were made by God as part of His creation. Therefore, the Philippines was a part of God's creation of the world. After the Great Flood in the time of Noah, many continents and islands appeared. So the descendants of Noah spread out to many parts of the world."

There's a Bible quote from Genesis, then she mentions legends and myths in the next paragraph. Then in the paragraph after that, she talks about scientists' and geologists' ideas.

Some pages later, she talks about the first Filipinos.

"Who were the first people to live in the Philippines? ... The best explanations we have about our distant past come from three main sources: (1) the story of God's creation in the Bible; (2) the story of evolution made by human scientists; and (3) legends and fairytales made up by imaginative people.

"We will study about all these three explanations about the origin of our ancestors. But because we are Christians, we believe that the story of God's creation of man, as described in the Holy Bible, is the real truth. Therefore, any other explanation about how early man came into being, is only the product of human theory or thinking, and it cannot be the truth....

"According to the Holy Bible, all men and women originated from the first man (Adam) and the first woman (Eve). After the Great Flood, Noah and the three sons left to settle the earth. Noah's sons--Shem, Ham and Japheth--themselves had sons after the flood. One of the sons of the youngest, Japheth, was named Javan (See Genesis 10:1-4). Out of Javan, Noah's grandson, came four sons named Elishah, Tharsis, the Kittim and the Rodanim. According to the Bible, 'From these maritime
peoples spread out into the r territory by their clans within their nations, each with its wown language.' Thus, Fr. Francisco, Colin, a Jesuit historian, wrote that the frist settlers of our country was Tharsis, son of Javan and great grandson of Noah, together with his brothers and their descendants. In time, the descendants of these Biblical characters settled in the parts of the world that e know as Asia, including the islands of the Philippines."

On the opposite page is a chart which shows the names of the descendants of Adam leading to Noah, then: "Noah --> Japheth --> Javan --> Elisha, Tharsis, the Kittim and the Rodanim --> their descendants were the early Filipinos"

===========

Argh.

I'm Catholic who studied in Catholic schools and in my Catholic education, we never had trouble reconciling an allegorical understanding of the Genesis accounts with the theological truths that: (1) God is the Creator of all, and that (2) there was a historical moment, even with the history of evolution, that a distinct creature called "man" emerged, different from all previous primates. It was never an irreconcilable issue.

A colleague told me that the notion of young-earth Creationism is very recent. The early Church fathers--even Fundamentalists' favorite St. Augustine--read the Genesis accounts as allegories, and they were never apologetic about it. I'll write more about the Church fathers and their exegesis of the Genesis creation accounts another time, but feel free to Google them.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why is it people want this war with evolution? Its not like evolution and ID cannot coexist! Well you have to loosely intrerpet the bible for evolution to coexist!

Actually the pope is an evolutionists, so is the 2 other popes before him! Believing the bible doesnt mean not believing in evolution! You just have to intrepet the bible your own way...

EVOLUTION IS INDISPUTABLE!

Anonymous said...

Hi Masipag,

ID is essentially a form of creationism - look up "The Wedge Document" on Wikipedia or refer to the summary findings of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover Trial if you'd like to see why.

Though ID accepts that evolution can happen it is a qualified acceptance.
By this I mean that ID accepts that evolution can happen only at the 'microevolutionary level'.

Also ID argues that certain organs or adaptations are "Irreducibly Complex" (IC) meaning that they could not have arisen through evolution because partial versions of the adaptations would not work.

The above argument is a fallacy because it relies solely on an argument by incredulity.

Each example that proponents of ID have brought out as an example of IC systems (the eye, the wing, bacterial flagella, blood clotting etc.) have been refuted by showing intermediary forms.

Anyway just thought I'd make that comment.

Cheers

Miguel

Anonymous said...

hehe sorry, i thought those arguments came from creationism, i knew that when people tried to push ID on me, they where pushing creationism, they allways get this smurk in the face when i start talking about extra terrestrials would also go under ID..

But evolution IS micro! The only difference between micro and macro is the timescale! essentially there is nothing called macroevolution..

But thanks for the comment, enjoyed reading it :)

Cheers fro Masipag

Anonymous said...

At one time last year (I think around Aug 2008), there was a news mentioning that DepEd pulled out several low quality books due after inspection due to low quality.

Does anyone knows if Sonia Zaide's book was included in the list of those low quality books?